The rational inquirer : disagreement, evidence, and the doxastic attitudes /

Weitere Versionen (2)

Disagreement is a pervasive feature of our intellectual lives. How should we respond to the problem of disagreement with someone whom we take to be our epistemic peer? Michele Palmira offers a framework for norms of inquiry according to which the rational response is to combine a process of double-c...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser:
Palmira, Michele
Format:
Elektronisch E-Book
Sprache:
Englisch
Veröffentlicht:
Oxford : Oxford University Press, [2025]
Ausgabe:
1st ed.
Zusammenfassung:
Disagreement is a pervasive feature of our intellectual lives. How should we respond to the problem of disagreement with someone whom we take to be our epistemic peer? Michele Palmira offers a framework for norms of inquiry according to which the rational response is to combine a process of double-checking with an attitude of hypothesis.
Umfang:
1 online resource (232 pages)
Zielpublikum:
Specialized.
Bibliografie:
Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN:
0-19-892518-2
0-19-892516-6
Schlagworte:
Inquiry (Theory of knowledge)
Discussion.
Debates and debating.
Philosophy.
Philosophy: epistemology & theory of knowledge.
Bezugswerke:
Links: