Location Choice, Portfolio Choice /

Households hold nondiversified stock portfolios of firms headquartered near their city of residence. Explanations assign a causal role for proximity, either in generating an informational advantage or a familiarity bias. Empirical analyses assume households locate randomly, even though they optimall...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser:
Branikas, Ioannis
Körperschaft:
National Bureau of Economic Research
Weitere Verfasser:
Hong, Harrison, Xu, Jiangmin
Format:
Elektronisch E-Book
Sprache:
Englisch
Veröffentlicht:
Cambridge, Mass. National Bureau of Economic Research 2017.
Zusammenfassung:
Households hold nondiversified stock portfolios of firms headquartered near their city of residence. Explanations assign a causal role for proximity, either in generating an informational advantage or a familiarity bias. Empirical analyses assume households locate randomly, even though they optimally select a city. This selection is important since latent location factors might be correlated with latent demand for local stocks. Building on location choice models from urban economics, we develop a Heckman (1977)-style model to account for the effect of location choices on portfolio choices. Adjusting for selection significantly reduces local bias and the performance of local stock picks.
Umfang:
1 online resource: illustrations (black and white);
Anmerkungen:
January 2017.
Schlagworte: